Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Pressure from default of European countries
Occupy Wall Street
Hong Kong Income Inequality
Citi Plans to Layoff Thousands
Great merger Movement
Big Issue Over Student's Hanging of Confederate Flag
Employed Women Dropping out of the Labor Force
CNN Hero Feeds Hungry for Seven Years Straight
California Creek name to stay the same despite cultural insensitivity claim
Economic Inequality
Obama compares current economic inequality to Great Depression
Report documents dramatic shift in immigrant workforce’s skill level
Main Causes of the Great Depression
Population profile of the United States
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
From the San Diego Chargers to the Los Angeles Chargers?
There have been recent rumors (back in August-September) that the San Diego chargers could be moving from San Diego sometime soon. One of its prospective new cities is the city of Los Angeles. If a new football stadium is built in L.A., then the Chargers might go through with the move, considering that their current stadium, Qualcomm Stadium, is considered outdated. A move to Los Angeles “would increase the team’s value by at least $200 million”. This increase in value will be a result of the new stadium, and more sponsorship opportunities only available in L.A. This potential move is interesting because there was a point in time where people thought San Diego would be the rival of San Francisco in Southern California. Instead of San Diego, that rival turned out to be L.A. And it would be another slap in the face of San Diego if they lose their professional team to Los Angeles.
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/07/sports/la-sp-san-diego-chargers-20110908
FIFA Financial Fair Play: Will it promote convergence?
FIFA’s Financial Fair Play Regulations will, in effect, combat “income inequality” among football (soccer) teams in Europe. Basically, in order to compete in leagues in Europe such as the UEFA Champions League, teams must fulfill a break even requirement – that is, they cannot spend more money in transfers and/or wages than they generate over a certain period. This will prevent football clubs like Manchester City (owned by Mansour bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, whose riches mainly come from the oil industry) from using Nahyan’s income from oil to outbid anyone because their revenues come from a source outside football (or in some cases in the past, clubs would take out loans that they have no means to pay). Theoretically, this will give clubs a level playing field because they will only be able to spend as much as they make in football. But, almost ironicallt, the clubs who earn the most football income are still the most popular clubs who have the most famous players and who play in the most advanced stadiums. So I believe the Financial Fair Play Regulations will curb SOME spending, but it won’t completely promote convergence, because the rich clubs will keep on being rich, while the minnows will find it hard to earn as much in terms of football revenue.
The NBA Lockout: battle of the 1%
The NBA lockout already ended a couple of weeks ago, but even as an avid basketball fan, I was so apathetic about the whole thing. It was owners vs players, billionaires vs millionaires. The sense of entitlement of these two camps was sickening; they are all part of the top 1% in terms of income (and the mean of basketball players’ income is highest among athletes), yet for months, they could not agree to a Collective Bargaining Agreement. And this was all happening during a time when income inequality was a genuine concern of the public. To see millionaires squabbling over who gets more was disappointing, when a normal American won’t even be able to earn a million in their lifetime.
Taxing the Rich
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/nyregion/cuomo-and-legislative-leaders-agree-on-tax-deal.html
Democracy on the Retreat?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/democracy-is-on-the-retreat-in-europe/2011/12/06/gIQA2CvpaO_story.html