Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Pressure from default of European countries
Occupy Wall Street
Hong Kong Income Inequality
Citi Plans to Layoff Thousands
Great merger Movement
Big Issue Over Student's Hanging of Confederate Flag
Employed Women Dropping out of the Labor Force
CNN Hero Feeds Hungry for Seven Years Straight
California Creek name to stay the same despite cultural insensitivity claim
Economic Inequality
Obama compares current economic inequality to Great Depression
Report documents dramatic shift in immigrant workforce’s skill level
Main Causes of the Great Depression
Population profile of the United States
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
From the San Diego Chargers to the Los Angeles Chargers?
There have been recent rumors (back in August-September) that the San Diego chargers could be moving from San Diego sometime soon. One of its prospective new cities is the city of Los Angeles. If a new football stadium is built in L.A., then the Chargers might go through with the move, considering that their current stadium, Qualcomm Stadium, is considered outdated. A move to Los Angeles “would increase the team’s value by at least $200 million”. This increase in value will be a result of the new stadium, and more sponsorship opportunities only available in L.A. This potential move is interesting because there was a point in time where people thought San Diego would be the rival of San Francisco in Southern California. Instead of San Diego, that rival turned out to be L.A. And it would be another slap in the face of San Diego if they lose their professional team to Los Angeles.
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/07/sports/la-sp-san-diego-chargers-20110908
FIFA Financial Fair Play: Will it promote convergence?
FIFA’s Financial Fair Play Regulations will, in effect, combat “income inequality” among football (soccer) teams in Europe. Basically, in order to compete in leagues in Europe such as the UEFA Champions League, teams must fulfill a break even requirement – that is, they cannot spend more money in transfers and/or wages than they generate over a certain period. This will prevent football clubs like Manchester City (owned by Mansour bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, whose riches mainly come from the oil industry) from using Nahyan’s income from oil to outbid anyone because their revenues come from a source outside football (or in some cases in the past, clubs would take out loans that they have no means to pay). Theoretically, this will give clubs a level playing field because they will only be able to spend as much as they make in football. But, almost ironicallt, the clubs who earn the most football income are still the most popular clubs who have the most famous players and who play in the most advanced stadiums. So I believe the Financial Fair Play Regulations will curb SOME spending, but it won’t completely promote convergence, because the rich clubs will keep on being rich, while the minnows will find it hard to earn as much in terms of football revenue.
The NBA Lockout: battle of the 1%
The NBA lockout already ended a couple of weeks ago, but even as an avid basketball fan, I was so apathetic about the whole thing. It was owners vs players, billionaires vs millionaires. The sense of entitlement of these two camps was sickening; they are all part of the top 1% in terms of income (and the mean of basketball players’ income is highest among athletes), yet for months, they could not agree to a Collective Bargaining Agreement. And this was all happening during a time when income inequality was a genuine concern of the public. To see millionaires squabbling over who gets more was disappointing, when a normal American won’t even be able to earn a million in their lifetime.
Taxing the Rich
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/nyregion/cuomo-and-legislative-leaders-agree-on-tax-deal.html
Democracy on the Retreat?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/democracy-is-on-the-retreat-in-europe/2011/12/06/gIQA2CvpaO_story.html
World after Gold standard
US lose Triple A rating
Following by the downgrade, the first we can see the panic spread among stock market. Either Dows and NASDAQ plunged on the following Monday and the dipping trend is still maintaining now with some swings.
Though stock market has been decline about 15% from the start of the bear market, US economy does not really look that bad. Actually, from the recent data, we can see a light recovery or flat down on the household sale and manufacturing data, and even much better than expected retail data with a 7% increase in Thanksgiving.
Once again, it'a good example to show us STOCK MARKET NOT NECESSARILY related to the performance of the economy. More or less the panic or enthusiastic take a big role on the market value.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44040574/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/t/us-government-loses-triple-a-credit-rating/
Turkish Immigrants Suffer in the Germany
1. 50 years ago, many Turks immigrated to Germany and a lot of them eventually became permanent immigrants. Unfortunately, Turkish immigrants still suffer significantly in the job market. A lot of this has to do with education as many Turkish immigrants still have trouble communicating in German. Discrimination also plays a role as some Germans have Islamophobia and are generally racist against certain minorities. Children of immigrants are also less likely to go to university-track high schools and on average experience greater drop out rates. This tells us that many foreign immigrant groups outside of the United States have also faced the same types of problems Blacks faced in the United States. In the past, Blacks suffered from discrimination, lack of education, lack of rights, and lack of job opportunities.
Shocks could disrupt weak economy
QE3 US
Modern economy shows us an interesting point that, even escaping from the gold standard, it doesn't mean that we can really use monetary policy to stimulate economy as freely as we think of.
http://www.actionforex.com/analysis/daily-forex-fundamentals/chances-of-qe3-rising;-ism-services-report-shows-rocky-road-still-ahead-for-us-20111205154876/
How Bad is the United States Fiscal Debt?
I read an article by Daniel Mitchell that discusses the fiscal trouble both the US and Europe currently are experiencing. Fortunately, the Europeans are fiscally worse off than the Americans. They started their welfare system earlier and the Europeans now spend an astonishing 49 percent of economic output! Not surprisingly, Greece, Portugal, and Ireland have all put their hands on bailouts.
Fortunately, US have time to turn things around before it experiences what Europe is currently facing. However, there isn’t too much time as US is only a few decades behind Europe. According to long-run forecasts from the Congressional Budget Office, US fiscal deficit will reach European levels as the baby boom generation retires. Daniel believes that needs to start turning Medicaid over to the states, start modernizing Medicare into a premium-support system, and start transitioning to a system of personal retirement accounts for younger workers.
Inequality in England
I read an article that discusses the rising inequality in England. The salaries of the rich increased at a significantly faster rate than the salaries of the poor. The earnings of chief executives of leading organizations increased by 11.2% and the earnings of senior corporate managers increased by 7.1%. On the other hand, the earnings of waiters and waitresses decreased by 11.2% and the earnings of cleaners fell 3.4%. Earnings are also decreasing in real terms. Overall, the average earnings went up by only 0.4% in gross terms while the inflation rate is 5%. A similar trend happened to the United States from 1970-2000. Unless something changes, inequality in England will end up being high as it is currently in the United States.
In my opinion, the rising inequality is because of the recession. Companies are trying to cut costs and the easiest way to do it is to lower salaries or fire people. The top earners decide how to lower total salary costs. And they usually decide to lower the salary of the low-skilled workers rather than lowering their own top executive level salaries. Unless the government somehow intervenes, this trend will probably continue.
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/